CHINESE JOURNAL OF ENERGETIC MATERIALS
+高级检索
高聚物粘结炸药老化模型比较分析
作者:
作者单位:

中国工程物理研究院化工材料研究所

作者简介:

张国辉(1985-),男,在读硕士,从事含能材料老化模型研究。e-mail: zhangguohui128@163.com

通讯作者:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金中国工程物理研究院联合基金重点项目(11076002)


Comparison of Aging Models of Polymer Bonded Explosives
Author:
Affiliation:

Institute of Chemical Materials, China Academy of Engineering Physics

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    概述并分析了Arrhenius、时间温度叠加原理和神经网络三种高聚物粘结炸药(PBX)老化模型的建立方法,利用上述方法对HMX基PBX在45~75 ℃下老化后的质量变化数据建模并预测寿命。上述三种方法预测该炸药在20 ℃下质量损失0.1%的贮存寿命分别为390 a、490 a和15.2 a。三种方法预测该炸药在50 ℃和60 ℃下质量损失0.2%所需的时间分别为1127 d,182 d; 1180 d,196 d; 1375 d,220 d; 表明Arrhenius和时温叠加原理建模预测结果彼此吻合较好,而神经网络模型对低于建模温度时寿命预测可信度较低。

    Abstract:

    Three aging models, including Arrhenius,time-temperature superposition principle and neural network were used to comparatively study the aged HMX based PBX. And the lifetime was predicted when this explosives lost 0.1% of their total mass at 20 ℃ and when the lost 0.2% of the total mass at 50 ℃ and 60 ℃. Results show that the lifetime predicted from Arrhenius, time-temperature superposition principle, neural network are 390 years, 490 years and 15.2 years and 1127 d, 1180 d, 1375 d; and 182 d, 196 d, 220 d, respectively. It is stated that the results calculated by Arrhenius is agreed with that by Time-temperature superposition principle, and the neural network model is not an available when below the modeling temperature.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
文章指标
  • PDF下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 摘要点击次数:
  • 引用次数:
引用本文

张国辉,韦兴文,陈捷,等.高聚物粘结炸药老化模型比较分析[J].含能材料, 2011, 19(6):679-683. DOI:10.3969/j. issn.1006-9941.2011.06.018.
ZHANG Guo-hui, WEI Xing-wen, CHEN Jie, et al. Comparison of Aging Models of Polymer Bonded Explosives[J]. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2011, 19(6):679-683. DOI:10.3969/j. issn.1006-9941.2011.06.018.

复制
历史
  • 收稿日期: 2011-07-19
  • 最后修改日期: 2011-10-20
  • 录用日期: 2011-10-24
  • 在线发布日期: 2012-02-22
  • 出版日期: